K.T.SANKARAN
K. R Renjithmon – Appellant
Versus
P. J. Mary – Respondent
1. The first respondent instituted a suit before the Sub Court, Ernakulam. She filed the suit as an indigent person. Indigent O.P.No.1 of 2010 was filed stating that she is not having sufficient resources to pay the court fee. A contention was put forward by the defendants that the application under Order XXXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure was not filed in the proper form. I.A.No.8999 of 2010 was filed by the plaintiff to correct the mistake so as to make the application in the proper form. The court below allowed that application by the order dated 7.2.2011, which is under challenge in this Original Petition.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies only to pleadings. The Expression "pleadings" is defined under Order VI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure as plaint or written statement. Therefore, the application is not maintainable. The court below noticed this contention and held that if Order VI Rule 17 cannot be applied, Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure can be invoked. Learned counsel for the petitioner also raised certain points in respect of the contention of the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.