SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ker) 643

ANTONY DOMINIC
Baburaj – Appellant
Versus
District Registrar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:P.R. Venketesh, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Rajasree, Government Pleader.

JUDGMENT :-

1. Petitioner herein and 7 others executed a deed of partition of an immovable property, which originally belonged to late Sri.Ponnan. The document was registered as partition deed NO.5/11 of Parali Sub Registry. The Sub Registrar entertained a doubt about the actual rate of duty payable on the instrument, viz, as to whether it would come under Sl.No.42(i) or 42(ii) of the Schedule to the Kerala Stamp Act.

2. He thereupon impounded the document under Section 33(1) of the Kerala Stamp Act and sent the document to District Registrar. The District Registrar considered the matter in exercise of his powers under Section 39 and issued Ext.P1 order dated 25/5/11. In that order, District Registrar found that the instrument in question comes under Sl.No.42 (ii) and not 42(i). As a result of the determination, petitioner and others are now saddled with the liability to pay 6% stamp duty as against 1% payable, had the document been classified under Sl.No.42(i).

3. Based on Ext.P1 order, Sub Registrar has issued Ext.P4 notice requiring the petitioner to remit a sum of `59,200/- as additional stamp duty. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed.

4. The contention rai









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top