SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ker) 860

K.T.SANKARAN
Abdul Arshad – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:
For Petitioner:Babu S. Nair, Advocate.
For Respondent: V. Tekchand, Public Prosecutor

Judgment :-

The Petitioner in these Bail Applications, Abdul Arshad, seeks bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He is one of the accused in several crimes registered at different Police Stations. The petitioner was arrested on 11.6.2011 in one case and his formal arrest was recorded in several other cases. In some of the cases, formal arrest of the petitioner is not recorded. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that in the crimes relating to three of the Bail Applications (B.A. Nos. 7429 of 2011, 7485 of 2011 and 7548 of 2011), the petitioner is not made an accused.

2. The offences alleged against the accused are under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 (Central Act No.43 of 1978) (hereinafter referred to as “Prize Chits Act”).

3. The petitioner herein and some other accused persons had filed Bail Applications before this Court on an earlier occasion. Those Bail Applications were dismissed by a detailed order dated 12th August, 2011. (See ILR 2011 (3) Kerala 856 = 2011 (3) KLT 796 = 2011 (3) KHC 519 = 2011 (3) KLJ 715.) For the sake of convenience, paragraphs 4 and 5


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top