SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ker) 121

THOMAS P.JOSEPH
S. Ambika – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Represented By S. I. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Nireesh Mathew, Advocate.
For Respondent: No Appearance.

Judgment :-

1. Petitioners are accused in Crime No. 869 of 2010 of Pathanapuram Police Station for offences punishable under Secs. 55(a) and (i) and 56(b) of the Abkari Act (for short, "the Act").

Petitioners are the licensee, Manger and Security, respectively of a bar attached hotel at Pathanapuram. Prosecution case is that on 07.08.2010 petitioners sold Indian Made Foreign Liquor (for short, "the IMFL") before sunrise and thereby committed offences as above stated. Sub Inspector of Police, Pathanapuram is said to have detected the offence on the said day at 4.30 a.m and arrested petitioners 2 and 3 at the spot. Annexure-A is the FIR while Annexure-B is the search list. Contention raised in this petition is that if at all the allegations are accepted, it only revealed commission of offence punishable under Sec.56(b) of the Act which is compoundable under Sec.67A of the Act as introduced by Act 3 of 2010. It is therefore prayed in this proceeding that Annexure-A, FIR to the extent it concerned offences punishable under Sec.55(a) and (i) of the Act may be quashed.

2. I have heard learned Senior Advocate appearing for petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. Learned Senior Advo


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top