K.T.SANKARAN
Velayudhan Padmanabhan – Appellant
Versus
K. Thyagrajan – Respondent
1. The first defendant in a suit for redemption of mortgage, filed by respondents 1 to 4 herein, is the appellant. The suit was dismissed by the trial court. The Appellate Court reversed the judgment and decree of the trial court and the suit was decreed.
2. The plaint schedule property originally belonged to Narayanan Asari Krishnan Asari. He died in 1947. His rights devolved on his children Kolappan Asari and Sivasubramonian Asari. Both of them passed away before 1956. The plaintiffs are the children of Kolappan Asari. The second defendant is the daughter of Sivasubramonian Asari. In 1952, Kolappan Asari and Sivasubramonian Asari executed Ext.A1 ottikuzhikanam deed in favour of the first defendant for `500/-. Ext.A1 property consists of ten cents of land excluding six jack trees and a mango tree, which were retained in the possession of the mortgagors. The land was put in the possession of the mortgagee. The period stipulated in Ext.A1 was eight years. According to the plaintiffs, Ext.A1 is a possessory mortgage. Since the daughter of Sivasubramonian Asari (one of the co-mortgagors) was not willing to join as a plaintiff, she was arrayed as the second defendant. The pl
Hussain Thangal v Ali (1961 KLT 1033)
Ayyan Govindan & ors. v Ayyan Kunjan (AIR 1964 Ker. 309)
Bansidhar Pandey v Masuden Singh AIR 1962 Pat 191
Narayana Pillai v Lekshmanan (1961 KLT 52)
Joseph v. Joseph Annamma (1979 KLT 322)
Krishnan Nair v Sivaraman Nambudiri (1967 KLT 78)
Puzhakkal Kuttappu v C.Bhargavi AIR 1977 SC 105
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.