SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ker) 787

C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, P.S.GOPINATHAN
Chairman-cum-Managing Director – Appellant
Versus
Titin P. S/o. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sheela Devi SC BSNL.
For the Respondent: ---

Judgment :

The respondents in O.A.No675/2010 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench assails, the order dated 27.5.2011, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The respondent herein is the applicant before the Tribunal. The father of the respondent, V.Pushkaran, who died on 13.10.2005, was a Telephone Mechanic under the petitioners. Seeking employment under the Compassionate Employment Scheme the respondent who is one among the three legal heirs, preferred an application before the petitioners along with requisite performa and consent from other legal heirs. The petitioners declined the request by Annexure-A1 order assailing which the respondent moved the Tribunal below. The Tribunal by the impugned order dated 27.5.2011 allowed the petition and directed the petitioners to reconsider the application filed by the respondent. Feeling aggrieved, this petition was filed.

2. We have heard Smt. I. Sheela Devi, The learned standing counsel for the petitioners, perused the impugned order and the documents. The argument of the petitioners is that following the death of the father of the respondent a family pension of Rs.3,830/- was granted to the mother o



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top