SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Ker) 118

K.T.SANKARAN
Sudheer, Ernakulam – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Prakash Kesavan, P.P. Genson, Advocates.
For the Respondent: K.K. Rajeev, Public Prosecutor.

Judgment

1. The following question of law is involved in this Bail Application: In a case involving an offence under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, can bail be refused on the ground that the accused is involved in other cases for the offence under Section 22(a) of the Act and for offences under the Indian Penal Code?

2. The Petitioner is the accused in Sessions Case No.319 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc II), Ernakulam. The offence alleged against the accused is under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'NDPS Act'). The Petitioner is in judicial custody since 11-3-2011. He seeks bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3. The prosecution case is the following: On 11-3-2011, at about 5 P.M., the Sub Inspector of Police, Ernakulam Town North Police Station found the petitioner/accused standing near a bike and two or three persons standing near him. On seeing the police, the other persons ran away. The petitioner/accused tried to escape on the bike. He was intercepted by the police. On search of his body, 10 ampules of diazepam we










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top