High Court of Kerala
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH
P.A. Ayub Khan
Versus
State of Kerala & Another
W.P.(C).No.1737 of 2012
Decided On : 20-01-2012
Maintainability - Judicial Consideration of Maintainability - The court held that maintainability is a matter to be considered on the juridical side, and directed the Registry to post all unnumbered cases before the Bench at the request of the counsel for judicial consideration of maintainability and for numbering, if ordered by the court.
Fact of the Case:
The case was initially considered unnumbered and not maintainable as a public interest litigation based on a decision of the Honourable Supreme Court. The President of the Kerala High Court Advocates’ Association and the Government Pleader raised concerns about the Registry's authority to consider maintainability of cases.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that maintainability is a matter to be considered on the juridical side, and directed the Registry to post all unnumbered cases before the Bench at the request of the counsel for judicial consideration of maintainability and for numbering, if ordered by the court.
Issues: The issues involved the maintainability of unnumbered cases and the authority of the Registry to consider maintainability without judicial consideration.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that maintainability is a matter to be considered on the juridical side, and directed the Registry to post all unnumbered cases before the Bench at the request of the counsel for judicial consideration of maintainability and for numbering, if ordered by the court.
Final Decision: The court directed the Registry to post all unnumbered cases before the Bench at the request of the counsel for judicial consideration of maintainability and for numbering, if ordered by the court.
C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J.
This case came up before this Bench yesterday as an unnumbered W.P.(C) with a noting by the Registry that the case is not maintainable as a public interest litigation based on decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in Girjesh Shrivastava v. State of M.P. reported in 2010 (4) K.L.T. Suppl.130. However, since we felt that maintainability itself needs to be considered by this Court on the judicial side, subject to decision on maintainability itself, we ordered numbering of the W.P.(C). Accordingly it is numbered and sent to the Bench today.
2. When the W.P.(C) was taken up for hearing, the President of the Kerala High Court Advocates’ Association also appeared and submitted that there is a general grievance for the Advocates that the Registry without any authority considers maintainability of various cases filed in the court and refuses to number the same. According to him, even after request by counsel, Registry even refuses to post the case before the Bench. Government Pleader also endorsed the same view stating that the objection raised by the Registry leads to even delay in posting even after numbering of the case involved.
3. We are of the considered view that maintainability is essentially a matter which needs to be considered on the juridical side. Registry is of course free to consider maintainability and if they do not find any case maintainable, they are free to record the reason and refuse to number the same without orders from the Bench. However, if party or the counsel filing the case requires maintainability to be adjudicated by the court on the judicial side, it is the duty of the Registry to send unnumbered case to the concerned Judge or Bench hearing the matter based on roaster fixed by the Chief Justice for consideration of maintainability and for numbering, if ordered by the court. We, therefore, direct the Registry to post all unnumbered cases before the Bench at the request of the counsel, if it is a today moving matter, on the date of filing itself or otherwise, on the date following noting of defect by the Registry. So far as cases otherwise maintainable but filed with defects are concerned, it is for the Registry to grant time for curing defect and such cases also should be posted before the Bench, it defect is not cured or the defect itself is subject-matter of contest on which party/counsel wants adjudication by the Bench. Registrar (Judicial) will circulate these instructions to the Filing Section.
A copy of this Order will be issued to the President of the Kerala High Court Advocates’ Association.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.