THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, P.BHAVADASAN
T. V. Sasikala – Appellant
Versus
Kerala Public Service Commission, Represented By The Secretary – Respondent
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.
1. The petitioner applied for selection on the basis of a notification issued by the Kerala Public Service Commission. Clause No.1(a)7 of that notification required that the application shall include a photograph taken within a period of six months of the application and with the name of the applicant and the date of the recording of the photograph written on that photograph. Admittedly, the petitioner did not write her name or enter the date of photographing, on the photograph which was printed and uploaded while submitting the application on-line. KPSC rejected that application. The petitioner's challenge against that stands turned down by the Kerala Administrative Tribunal. In doing so, the Tribunal has followed the unreported judgment dated 4.7.2011 of a learned single Judge of this Court (Mr.Justice C.T.Ravikumar) in W.P.(C). No.17767 of 2011. Hence this original petition by her.
2. Arguing that the KPSC would be well within its authority to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to cure the defect, since the date of examination has not been announced, the learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the decision reported in Manojk
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.