SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Ker) 491

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, J.
C.H. Ashokan
Versus
State of Kerala
B.A. Nos.3632 of 2012, 3650 of 2012 & 3900 of 2012
Decided On : 02-07-2012

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M.K. Damodaran (Sr.), Alan Papali, Sojan Micheal, Gilbert George Correya, V.S. Boban, A. Velappan Nair, Advocates.
For the Respondent:K.P. Dandapani, Advocate General.

Bail is the rule and committal to jail is the exception, and the nature and gravity of the accusation are key considerations for granting bail.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Conspiracy - Secs.143, 147, 148, 302 r/w 149 IPC, Secs.120(B), 109, 118, 201, 212 IPC, Secs.3 & 5 of Explosive Substance Act

Fact of the Case:

Accused filed bail applications in a case involving the brutal murder of a political leader. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy by local leaders to murder the victim, who had formed a new political party. The accused argued that their arrest was politically motivated and that the evidence against them was based on hearsay and alleged confession statements.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the gravity of the offence and the period of detention already undergone. Bail was denied to two of the accused and granted to one with stringent conditions.

Issues: Alleged political motivation for arrest, admissibility of evidence, and the nature of the offence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the principles of bail, including the nature and gravity of the accusation, likelihood of the offence being repeated, and the larger interest of the public. It also emphasized that bail is the rule and committal to jail is the exception.

Final Decision: Bail denied to two accused and granted to one with stringent conditions.

JUDGMENT

1. These are the bail applications filed by accused Nos.15, 16 and 3 respectively in Crime No.433/2012 of Vadakara Police Station, Kozhikode District. The offences alleged against them and other accused are under Secs.143, 147, 148 and 302 r/w 149 IPC and under Secs.120(B), 109, 118, 201 and 212 IPC and also under Secs.3 & 5 of Explosive Substance Act.

2. It is alleged that on 4.5.2012 at 10.15 PM at a place called Vallikkad, the motorcycle ridden by Mr. T.P. Chandrasekharan, the leader of a local party -Revolutionary Marxist Party (RMP) was hit by the Innova Car used by the assailants and when he fell down he was brutally murdered by the persons who reached there in the Innova Car by hacking Mr.Chandrasekharan with swords. It is further alleged that in order to create an atmosphere of terror so as to desist other persons approaching the scene, the assailants exploded bombs also and thereafter the assailants escaped from the scene.

3. The prosecution contends that T.P.Chandrasekharan was earlier a local leader of CPI(M). Because of some differences of opinion, it was stated that, the deceased T.P. Chandrasekharan and others were expelled or they severed their connection with CPI(M). Thereafter they formed a party -Revolutionary Marxist Party (RMP). It is further alleged that the persons and sympathisors beloning to CPI(M) of that locality began showing allegiance to RMP being influenced/attracted by Mr.T.P. Chandrasekharan. According to the prosecution, a conspiracy was hatched by local leaders belonging to CPI(M) to murder Mr.T.P. Chandrasekharan. It is stated that the petitioners, especially A15 and A16 were some of the conspirators and it was pursuant to that conspiracy Mr.Chandrasekharan was hacked to death.

4. Petitioners were arrested by the police on 15.5.2012 and since then they have been in custody.

5. Learned Senior Counsel Sri.M.K.Damodaran, appearing for A15 and A16 and learned counsel for A3, Sri.T.G.Rajendran and also the learned Advocate General have been heard.

6. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners vehemently argued that the investigating team is dancing to the tune of the leaders of a political party in power and that the names of leaders of CPI(M) are supplied by the leaders of the party in power and it is at the behest of the ruling party, the members of CPI(M) are being arrested. It is also argued that while arresting the petitioners, the directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in D.K.Basu's Case [1997 SCC (Cri) 92] were flouted by the police officials.

7. It is submitted on behalf of the prosecution that the investigation is being conducted by the Special Investigation Team. Three Dy.S.Ps; Mr.K.V.Santhosh Kumar, Mr.Josy Cherian and Mr.Shoukath Ali are the main investigating officers. The contention that the directions contained in D.K.Basu's case were violated have been assailed by the prosecution pointing out the entries in the case diary regarding the notices issued to the petitioners and also as to how the formalities were complied with. It is also pointed out that the arrestees were got examined by the Medical Officer within every 24 hours and that the near relatives of the arrestees were also duly informed. Further, the assistance of a legal aid counsel was also provided but as the petitioners had engaged there own counsel, the service of the legal counsel was not necessary. I could not see any patent illegality or unfairness in the investigation so far conducted.

8. Now, the main question is whether the petitioners are entitled to be released on bail at this stage. It is strenuously argued by the learned Senior Counsel Mr.M.K.Damodaran that A15 and A16 were arrested solely on hear-say information and the alleged confession statements of the co-accused. A15 and A16 are the local leaders of that political party. It is argued by the learned Advocate General that there were reports from the Intelligence Wing of the police that slogans were shouted and public speeches w























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top