SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Ker) 618

P.S.GOPINATHAN
C. L. Antony – Appellant
Versus
K. A. Anto – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:P. Vijaya Bhanu (Sr.), Smt. P.G. Rehna, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Smt. S. Hyma, G.P.

JUDGMENT :

1. Appellant is the complainant in C.C.No.554/2002 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Thrissur. He prosecuted the first respondent alleging offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (N.I.Act ) with a plea that the first respondent owed a sum of Rs.5,35,000/-and in discharge of the said liability, Ext.P1 cheque dated 12.5.1998 drawn on Canara Bank, Puthanchanda, Trivandrum branch was issued and that when sent for collection through the State Bank of India, Thrissur branch, Ext.P1 was returned dishonoured for insufficient funds along with Ext.P2 memo issued from the drawee bank and Ext.P3 intimation issued from the payee's bank. Exts.P2 and P3 are dated 14.8.1998 and 21.8.1998 respectively. The appellant pleaded that he got Exts.P2 and P3 on 9.9.1998 and issued a notice on 14.9.1998, a copy of which was marked as Ext.P5, demanding discharge of the liability. Though the first respondent acknowledged the notice on 16.9.1998 the liability was not discharged, but a reply was caused.

2. The first respondent, in response to the process served, entered appearance and pleaded not guilty when the particulars of the offence were read over



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top