SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Ker) 465

High Court of Kerala
V. CHITAMBARESH, J.
Preeti Yohannan
Versus
Abraham K. Mathen
Tr. P. (C) No. of 2012
Decided on: 26-06-2012

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Philip T. Varghese, Thomas T. Varghese, Achu Shubha Abraham, Advocates.
For the Respondent: -------

Headnote:Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 24 - Kerala Civil Rules of Practice, 1971, Rule 57-Even if the parties are same separate petitions should be filed for transfer of the cases.

Judgment:

1. The Registry has noted a defect and has objected to the numbering of the Transfer Petition (Civil) filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The objection is that separate petitions need to be filed to transfer independent proceedings pending in the court below. The petitioner seeks transfer of the following proceedings from the Family Court, Nedumangad to the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram.

(i) O.P. No. 630/2012 filed for dissolution of marriage.

(ii) O.P. No. 488/2012 filed for declaration of guardianship.

(iii) O.P. No. 527/2012 filed for recovery of money and articles.

(iv) O.P. No. 636/2012 filed for custody of minor child.

2. The High Court Rules, 1971 (Kerala) of course do not specify as to whether separate petitions should be filed for transfer of independent proceedings. But we get the necessary cue from the Civil Rules of Practice (Kerala) though they are intended to regulate the procedure in the Subordinate Civil Court in the State. The relevant rule therein is as follows:

"57. Application for transfer:

(1) ………………….

(2) ………………….

(3) A separate application shall be presented in respect of each suit, appeal or other proceedings of which transfer is sought. "

The power to transfer under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is exercised not only by the District Court but also the High Court. It will be anomalous to permit a consolidated petition to be moved in the High Court when separate petitions are insisted in the District Court.

3. Instances are many where a consolidated petition for transfer is filed even though the parties are different in the proceedings merely because a few of them are common. Separate petitions for transfer of independent suit, appeal or proceeding is essential to adjudge the need set forth in the same. Different considerations prevail for transfer of independent proceedings even if they have a common nexus and the finding in one has a bearing in another. The contention that all procedure should be deemed to have been permitted unless prohibited in the High Court Rules, 1971 (Kerala) does not at all impress me.

4. The objection raised by the Registry is sustained. The Registry shall return the Transfer Petition (Civil) to the petitioner for representation after appropriate correction.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top