SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Ker) 399

High Court of Kerala
MANJULA CHELLUR & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JJ.
State of Kerala, Rep. By The Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others Versus
M.R. Karunakaran & Another
WA.NO. 581 OF 2011 IN WPC/28468/2008
Decided on: 08-06-2012

Advocates Appeared:
For The Petitioners: Sunil Cyriac, Government Pleader.
For The Respondents:Bysmt. R. Udaya Jyothi, Dr. V.N. Sankarjee, V.N. Madhusudanan, Advocates.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement of family pension to the parents of a deceased government employee is subject to the conditions under Rule 6A, and the absence of specific provisions for the situation after the widow's remarriage does not grant the parents the right to claim family pension or maintenance from the daughter-in-law.

Headnote:

Rule 6A - Interpretation of Kerala Service Rules - Rule 90(6) in Section VII of Part III K.S.R. - Summary of the Acts and Sections: The court discussed the interpretation of Rule 90(6) and Rule 6A of the Kerala Service Rules, which define the eligibility for family pension. The court emphasized the conditions under Rule 6A for the parents to be entitled to family pension and the implications of the widow's remarriage on the entitlement of the parents.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the interpretation of Rule 6A of the Kerala Service Rules regarding the entitlement of family pension to the parents of a deceased government employee, in the context of the widow's remarriage and the absence of children.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the widow of the deceased was entitled to family pension at the time of his death, and the absence of provisions for the situation after the widow's remarriage did not grant the parents the right to claim family pension or maintenance from the daughter-in-law. The court set aside the judgment of the Single Judge and allowed the Writ Appeal.

Issues: The issues revolved around the entitlement of family pension to the parents of a deceased government employee in the absence of children and the impact of the widow's remarriage on the eligibility of the parents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the entitlement of the parents to family pension is subject to the conditions under Rule 6A, and the absence of surviving members of the family as specified in Rule 90(6) would lead to the entitlement of the parents. The court also highlighted that the absence of specific provisions for the situation after the widow's remarriage did not grant the parents the right to claim family pension or maintenance from the daughter-in-law.

Final Decision: The court set aside the judgment of the Single Judge and allowed the Writ Appeal.

Judgment:-

Manjula Chellur, CJ.

1. State of Kerala before us is aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Single Judge wherein Rule 6 A of Rule 90 of Part III Kerala Service Rules ("KSR" for short) was interpreted. The learned Single Judge opines that the ultimate object of sub rule 6 A of Rule 90 should be read down to mean that the parents would be entitled to the family pension if the wife remarries and the wife becomes disentitled for family pension.

2. Aggrieved by the said judgment, in the present appeal, contention of the State is that when Rule 90 (6A) of Part III K.S.R. provided how family pension would be admissible to the parents of the deceased and who are all included in the family as contemplated under sub rule 6 of Rule 90. The learned counsel takes us through Note 1 of sub Rule 6 of rule 90 as well as the decision reported in The Accounts Officer (Pension Sanction) v. Mariyamma - 2010 (2) KLT 241).

3. In the present case it is not in dispute that one Sajithkumar, who was working as a Village Officer in the Revenue Department died on 10-11-1998 leaving behind him his wife and parents. Admittedly, the couple did not have children. Therefore, the wife and the parents of the deceased government servant were the legal representatives left behind by him.

4. Then coming to the payment of family pension one has to go by the Rules provided under the KSR. This is covered under Part III. "Family" includes the following persons who are entitled to get contributed family pension. Rule 90 (6) in Section VII of Part III

K.S.R. reads as follows:-

"90(6) "Family" for purposes of those rules, means the following relatives of the

employee, namely:-

a) Wife, in the case of male employee

b) Husband, in the case of female employee

c) Eldest eligible son/daughter (in the order of seniority) till marriage or till attaining the age of 25 years or till he/she gets employed, whichever is earlier.

d) Children suffering from Physical /mental disorder or disability.

e) Unmarried daughters above 25 years.

f) Son/daughter adopted legally before retirement

g) Parents (in equal shares)

h) Judicially separated wife

i) Judicially separated husband

j) Disabled divorced daughters

k) Widowed disabled daughters".

Note I. If there are no surviving members of the family as in items (a) to (e) above. Government may sanction family pension to the members, referred to in items (f) and (g) subject to the conditions prescribed in sub-r.6A. If the members referred to in items (a) to (g) are not surviving, the family pension may be paid to the member specified in items (h) or (i) as the case may be, provided the employee has included the details of such member also in Form 5 A. If judicially separated wife/husband is not included in the details of family furnished in Form 5 A, family pension is not payable to judicially separated wife/husband".

G.O. (P) 330/75/Fin.dated 23rd July, 1975.

Note 2: Legal marriage after retirement shall also be considered for the purpose of these rules. In such cases, the retired officer shall file a revised Form 5 A before the Accountant General after marriage. In cases where Form 5 A has not been filed due to death of the pensioner, the family pension will be sanctioned after observing the procedure laid down in Rule 118 (2) Part III, Kerala Service rules. In the case of second marriage after retirement, necessary certificates/documents from the authorities concerned duly certified by the Notary Public of the locality to the effect that the spouse of the first marriage is not alive and the marriage of the deceased Government servant with the applicant was lawful and legally valid one shall also be produced.

Note 3: The terms 'sons' and daughters' occurring in clauses (c ) and (d) of sub rule (6) include posthumous sons and posthumous daughters.

Note 4: In the case of disabled divorced daughter of a deceased employee/pensioner whose marriage has been legally annulled, family pension is admissible from the date on which h











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top