1. These two original petitions, both filed under Article 227 of the Constitution are by the rival side in appending suit on the file of the Sub Court. Ernakulam.

2. O.P. (C) No.312/11 has been filed by the plaintiffs in the suit, three in number, against Ext.P6 order passed by the learned Sub Judge disallowing the application moved by them for interim attachment of an immovable property belonging to the defendants recording the averment in the affidavit filed by the 5th defendant who represented the 1st defendant company also as its Managing Director that such property will not be alienated. O.P. (C) No.429/12 has been filed by the defendants against the common order passed by the learned Sub Judge (Ext.P6 in the OP) on two applications moved by the plaintiffs directing for issue of summons to some bank managers to appear and produce the loan documents of the defendants, and from the authority concerned to produce an application purported to have been moved by the 5th defendant to remove his name from the list of willful defaulters. The learned Sub Judge after hearing the applications of the plaintiffs negativing the objections of the defendants, allowed them under a comm