K.T.SANKARAN, M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
Easwar Gangaram Patil – Appellant
Versus
Uduppi Madhava Mandiram Trust – Respondent
K.T. Sankaran J.,
1. The respondent filed Rent Control Petition No.151 of 2011 against the petitioner before the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam under Sections 11(7) and 11(8) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The petition schedule room is occupied by the tenant and he is doing business in silver in that building. According to the landlord, a temple is situated in the ground floor of the building and the space occupied by the petition schedule room is required for the purpose mentioned in the Rent Control Petition.
2. Before filing the Rent Control Petition, a notice was issued by the landlord on 28.7.2011 [Ext.R1(a)]. In that notice, mention was made about the shrine of Sree Anjaneya housed in the building. In the reply notice sent by the tenant, there is no dispute regarding the nature of the shrine in the place. However, in the counter filed by the tenant in the Rent Control Petition, the tenant stated thus:
"There is no public or private temple inside the premises. It is only a puja room in the ground floor. Some pujas are conducted, as the members are Brahmins. This is a practice usually done in all Brahmin business establishments, as well as their
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.