SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Ker) 227

G. Balagangadharan Nair, V.P. Gopalan Nambiar, JJ.
THE JAY ENGINEERING WORKS LTD.
Versus
STATE OF KERALA
T.R.C. No. 31 of 1978
Decided On: Decided On : 21-11-1978

Advocates Appeared:
V.M. Kurien, A.I. Mohamed Basheer, K.K. Gangadharan, E.M. Sadrul Aram and A.V. Thomas, for the petitioner
The Government Pleader, for the respondent.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the claim for deduction from turnover can be made only after the return of the goods, as supported by the interpretation of statutory provisions and case law.

Headnote:

sales returns - tax revision case - Kerala General Sales tax Rules - rule 9(b) - section 2(xxvii) of the Act - exemption from assessment of turnover - interpretation of statutory provisions and case law - influence on court's decision

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a dealer in fans, sewing machines, and spare parts, claimed exemption for sales returns under rule 9(b) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules for the assessment year 1972-73. The claim was disallowed on the ground that the turnover in question was not included in the return of assessment for that year.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the claim for refund could only be made after the return of the goods, which occurred after the assessment year. The court interpreted the statutory provisions and case law to support the assessee's claim for deduction from turnover.

Issues: Interpretation of rule 9(b) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules and its relation to section 2(xxvii) of the Act, as well as the influence of case law on the claim for exemption from assessment of turnover.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the claim for deduction can be made only after the return of the goods, and the refund of their sale price. The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of statutory provisions and case law, including rulings of the Madras and Andhra Pradesh High Courts.

Final Decision: The tax revision case was allowed, the order of the Tribunal was set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the Tribunal for passing consequential orders in accordance with law and the court's observations.

JUDGMENT

GOPALAN NAMBIYAR, C.J.

This tax revision case raises a somewhat interesting question. The question of law which has been formulated in the memorandum of revision in accordance with the form prescribed, is as follows :

"Is not the sales returns of Rs. 98,400 liable to be deducted under rule 9(b) of the Kerala General Sales tax Rules from the total turnover for the year 1972-73, as the goods were returned within three months from the date of delivery of the goods and its sales turnover was returned and taxed when the sales were made ?"

The assessee is a dealer in fans, sewing machines and spare parts. For the assessment year 1972-73, they returned before the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Special Circle, Ernakulam, total and taxable turnovers of Rs. 53,31,654.38 and Rs. 52,02,943.27. Exemption was claimed in respect of a turnover of Rs. 1,28,711.11. The turnover in respect of which exemption was claimed was made up of Rs. 30,311.11, under sales to Indian Naval Services Canteen, and Rs. 98,400 under the sales returns. The first item was allowed, and the second was disallowed on the ground that this was not included in the turnover for the year in question. The year in question was 1972-73. The claim for exemption of the turnover was based on rule 9(b) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, which is as follows :

"9. Determination of taxable turnover. - In determining the taxable turnover, the amounts specified in the following clauses shall, subject to the conditions specified therein, be deducted from the total turnover of the dealer : ......

(b) (i) all amounts allowed to purchasers in respect of goods returned by them within a period of 3 months from the date of delivery of the goods, to the dealer when the goods are taxable on the amount for which they have been sold provided that the accounts show the date on which the goods were returned and the date on which and the amount for which refund was made or credit was allowed to the purchaser;

(ii) all amounts received from the sellers in respect of goods returned to them within a period of 3 months from the date of delivery of goods by the dealer when the goods are taxable on the amount for which they have been bought provided that the accounts show the date on which the goods were returned and the date on which and the amount for which refund was received; ........."

The rule allows deduction of all amounts to purchasers in respect of goods returned by them within a period of three months from the date of delivery of the goods to the dealer when the goods are taxable to the dealer. It seems to us plain that the claim for refund can be made only after the return of the goods. In this case, the goods were returned in April; and the claim for exemption could have been made only subsequent thereto as it was actually made. It appears to us, at the first blush at any rate, to be rather impracticable that the claim should have been negatived on the ground that for the assessment year in question, viz., 1972-73, the turnover in respect of which the exemption was claimed, was not included in the return of assessment. It could not obviously be so included, as the return of the goods itself was only subsequent to the close of the assessment year on 31st March, 1972.

2. But this view which commends itself to us at the first blush on the language of the rule, and which seems to be supported, as we shall show, by a decision of the Madras High Court and another decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, has been strongly objected to by the learned Government Pleader. The learned Government Pleader argued with force that the rule should not be read and construed in isolation, but must be related to the provisions of the Act. He invited our attention to the definition of "turnover" in section 2(xxvii) of the Act. That section defines "turnover" as the aggregate amount for which the goods are either bought, or sold, or supplied or distributed by a dealer, either directly or throug













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top