GOVINDA PILLAI, GANGADHARA MENON
AHAMAD PILLAI SAITHU MUHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
Gangadhara Menon, J
[1] Accused 1,6 & 2 are the applts. Accused 1 & 2 were convicted under Sections 376, 453, 609 (ii) & 341, T. P.C. & sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years, under Section 376, rigorous imprisonment for 6 months under Section 453 & another 6 months' rigorous imprisonment under Section 509 (ii). They were also given a sentence of simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 341, T. P.C. Accused 6 was convicted under Section 453, 509 (ii) & 341, T. P.C. & sentenced to rigorous imprisonment,, for 6 months under Section 453, another 6 months under Section 509 (ii) & simple imprisonment for one month under Section 341, T. P.C. The sentences were directed to run consecutively. In convicting accused l & 2 under Section 509 (ii), & 341, Section 28, T. P.C. was also applied. Accused 3 to 5 were acquitted & set at liberty.
[2] The prosecution case was follows: P. W. 1 who was a young girl of 19 had been married to P. W. 2 a goldsmith on 20 7-1124. After marriage they were living as husband & wife in a building in Netttayam in Vattiyoor Kavu. P. W. 2 was engaged in the business of making ornaments in gold & silver & for this purpose he h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.