T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Park Residency Ernakulam, Represented by its Managing Partner Kuruvila Augustine – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala Represented by Secretary to Government Revenue Department Secretariat Thiruvananthapuram – Respondent
1. The challenge is against Ext.P12 order passed by the District Collector rejecting the revision petition filed by the petitioner under the Transfer of Registry Rules.
2. The petitioner is a partnership firm represented by its Managing Partner, which is known as M/s. Park Residency. The partnership firm was initially named as M/s. Maria Residency which has been conducting hotel business. Four items of land, viz. 4.5 ares and 0.52 ares in Sy. No.339/6, 1.71 ares in Sy. No.339/7 and 0.58 ares in Sy. No.335/1 were purchased in the name of the partnership as per sale deed No.2155/03, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P9. After the purchase, mutation was effected and Thandaper No.6185 of Ernakulam Village was allotted.
3. Two new partners were inducted and the partnership was reconstituted. After reconstitution, the firm is known as M/s. Park Residency. Ext.P6 is the copy of the Deed of Reconstitution of partnership and Ext.P7 is the copy of the certificate containing registration in the name of the new partnership with effect from 17.4.2010. Ext.P8 is the copy of the deed of amendment to the partnership.
4. The Tahsildar was approached by filing an application for mutatio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.