VAIDIALINGAM
Kunhutty Sahib – Appellant
Versus
Veeramkutty – Respondent
2. It was the further case of the plaintiff that the complaint filed by the defendant, namely, Ext. A1. on 3-10-1951 was false to the knowledge of the defendant and he has given the complaint without any reasonable and probable cause and with malice just to put the plaintiff to disgrace and loss.
3. In consequence of the judgment in his favour of the criminal court evidenced by Ext. A2, the plaintiff called upon the defendant by his notice. Ext. A8, to pay him damages as claimed therein. The defendant by his reply notice Ext. A7 has affirmed the allegations made by him in hi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.