S.VELU PILLAI
K. R. Sadasiva Iyer – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
On 17-4-1958, the 3rd respondent terminated the service of the petitioner with effect from 20-5-1958. This, it was complained, was in contravention of orders, Exts. P-4 P-5 and P-6. It is seen, that the second respondent, the Director of Public Instruction, made a clarification by Ext. P-8 on 27-4-1958, that the orders aforesaid had allowed no option to the management to terminate the services of persons like the petitioner who had been re-employed, and that the petitioner may therefore be reinstated in service. There had been subsequent petitions by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.