M.MADHAVAN NAIR
Parvathi Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Kuttan Pillai – Respondent
2. The suit was dismissed on 23-3-1957. On 6-4-1957 the plaintiff filed an application in the trial court under Order 9, Rule 9, C.P.C. He has also preferred an appeal before the District Court of Trivandrum from the decree dismissing his suit.
3. The application under Order IX Rule 9 was dismissed by the learned Munsiff on 19-11-1957 on the ground that no such application would lie in the face of the disposal of the suit on merits under Order XVII, Rule 3, C.P.C. The appeal from the decree preferred by the plaintiff was dismissed in the District Court on 5-11-1958. Meanwhile the plaintiff had preferred a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal from the order dismissing his application for restoration of the suit. The learned Subordinate Judge before whom that Civil Miscellaneous Appeal came up for disposal allowed the same by an order dated 6-12-1958 holding that Order XVII, Rule 3 could not apply to the instant case and therefore the dismissal of the suit by the trial Court must be dee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.