SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Ker) 11

M.MADHAVAN NAIR
Parvathi Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Kuttan Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
G. Viswanatha Iyer, for Petitioners; T.K. Narayana Pillai and D. Narayanan Potti, for Respondent.

ORDER :- This C.R.P. is by defendants 1 and 5 against an order of the Subordinate Judge of Trivandrum remanding for fresh disposal the plaintiffs petition for restoration of the suit under Order 9, Rule 9, C.P.C.

2. The suit was dismissed on 23-3-1957. On 6-4-1957 the plaintiff filed an application in the trial court under Order 9, Rule 9, C.P.C. He has also preferred an appeal before the District Court of Trivandrum from the decree dismissing his suit.

3. The application under Order IX Rule 9 was dismissed by the learned Munsiff on 19-11-1957 on the ground that no such application would lie in the face of the disposal of the suit on merits under Order XVII, Rule 3, C.P.C. The appeal from the decree preferred by the plaintiff was dismissed in the District Court on 5-11-1958. Meanwhile the plaintiff had preferred a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal from the order dismissing his application for restoration of the suit. The learned Subordinate Judge before whom that Civil Miscellaneous Appeal came up for disposal allowed the same by an order dated 6-12-1958 holding that Order XVII, Rule 3 could not apply to the instant case and therefore the dismissal of the suit by the trial Court must be dee










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top