HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.MADHAVAN NAIR, J.
Narayanaru Nampiathiri
Versus
Govindan Nair
C.R.P. No.517 of 1959
Decided On : 12-01-1961
Appealable Order - Small Cause Court - The provisions of Order XXI relating to process against movable properties of judgment-debtors can be invoked by Small Cause Courts. An order under Rule 46-C of Order XXI, C.P.C. passed by Small Cause Court is appealable under Rule 46-I of Order XXI CPC.
Fact of the Case:
The decree-holder attached the unpaid purchase money due from the petitioner to the 2nd defendant. The petitioner claimed to have discharged the amount prior to the attachment. The court found the discharge pleaded was untrue and held the garnishee liable to deposit the amount in court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the impugned order was appealable under Rule 46-I of Order XXI, C.P.C. and therefore the petition for revision of the same was incompetent.
Issues: The main issue was the appealability of the order made by the Small Cause Court under Rule 46-C of Order XXI, C.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the provisions of Order XXI relating to process against movable properties of judgment-debtors can be invoked by Small Cause Courts and that an order under Rule 46-C of Order XXI, C.P.C. passed by Small Cause Court is appealable under Rule 46-I of Order XXI CPC.
Final Decision: The court held that the order in question was appealable and therefore the petition for revision of the same was not maintainable. The petition was returned to the petitioner.
2. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent that the impugned order is appealable under R.46-1 of Order XXI, C.P.C. and therefore this petition for revision of the same is incompetent.
3. Order XXI, Rule 46-I reads:
"46-I. Orders appealable: An order made under rules 46-B, 46-C or 46-E, shall have the same force as a decree and shall be appealable as such."
The learned counsel for the petitioner would however say that the order having been made by a Small Cause Court no appeal lies therefrom. I am afraid that this contention proceeds on a misunderstanding of the provisions of Order L, C.P.C. Order L, R.1 excludes only so much of the First Schedule of the Code of Civil Procedure as relates to "the execution of decree against immovable property or the interest of a Partner in partnership property" from being applied by Courts of Small Cause jurisdiction.
It is clear therefore that the provisions of Order XXI relating to process against movable properties of judgment-debtors can be invoked by Small Cause Courts also. A proceeding in garnishee relates only to movable assets of the judgment-debtor; as such an order under Rule 46-C of Order XXI, C.P.C. passed by Small Cause Court is appealable under Rule 46-I of Order XXI CPC. The exclusion of the applicability of Ss.96 to 112 and Orders XLI to XLV to Small Cause suits cannot affect the question because the appealability of orders in garnishee is expressly provided in Rule 46-I of Order XXI and not in any of these excepted Sections or Orders. I hold therefore that the order in question is appealable; and as such this petition for revision of the same is not maintainable. The petition will however be returned to the petitioner.
Order accordingly.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.