SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ker) 259

THOMAS P.JOSEPH
K. Lekshmi – Appellant
Versus
Letha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Shaj, S. Sajju, Advocates.

Judgment :

1. This original petition is filed by the plaintiff in O.S. No.461 of 2011 of the Munsiff's Court, Adoor, aggrieved by the dismissal of I.A. No.2249 of 2011, confirmed by the learned Additional District Judge, Pathanamthitta, in C.M.A. No.41 of 2011.

2. Petitioner filed the suit for a decree for prohibitory injunction against the respondents tresspassing into the suit property. She also filed I.A. No.2249 of 2011 for an order of temporary injunction. Respondents claimed that they were residing in the building of the suit property since long in view of the relationship they had with the husband of petitioner and that petitioner and her men, under guise of the ex parte, ad interim order of injunction she obtained in I.A. No.2249 of 2011 forcibly evicted them. Both sides produced documents in support of their respective contentions. Learned Munsiff held that petitioner was not able to prove a prima facie case, found more probability for the case pleaded by the respondents and consequently dismissed I.A. No.2249 of 2011.

3. Petitioner challenged that order in C.M.A. No.41 of 2011. Learned Additional District judge after a reappraisal of the materials on record came to the sa









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top