B.KEMAL PASHA
R. Gopalakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Food Inspector Neyyatinkara – Respondent
1. Petitioner, who is the second accused in S.T.No.347/1993 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Neyyattinkara, has unsuccessfully challenged his conviction and sentence before the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram, through Criminal Appeal No.49/1995. The learned Additional Sessions Judge concurred with the findings entered by the trial court, confirmed the conviction and sentence, and dismissed the appeal.
2. Samples of ice cream were drawn by PW 1, Mobile Squad Food Inspector, Thiruvananthapuram, from the first accused. The present petitioner, being the owner of the shop, who is the licensee, was arraigned as A2. A1 died during the pendency of the appeal before the learned Additional Sessions Judge and thereby, the charge against him abated.
3. On going through the procedure adopted by PW1, it seems that he had complied with all the legal formalities. The sampling was proper, and the sample was forwarded to the Public Analyst, and he obtained Ext.P12 report. On getting Ext.P12 report, the complaint was preferred before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Neyyattinkara. Thereupon, the parties, on getting notice under Section 13(2) of the Preven
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.