P.D. Rajan, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment in O.P.No.126 of 2012 of Family Court, Moovattupuzha. The husband, who was the respondent before the Family court is the appellant herein and wife, who was the petitioner before the Family court is the respondent. The above case was filed by the wife against her husband for realization of gold ornaments and other valuables included in plaint A schedule list. Petitioner had also claimed compensation of Rs.Two Lakhs towards mental agony from her husband. She also filed another petition, O.P.125 of 2012 under Section 13 (1)(a) of Hindu Marriage Act, for divorce. The husband denied the allegations in both cases by filing objections.

2. Both cases were tried jointly by the lower court. To prove the case, on the side of petitioner, Pws 1 to 6 were examined and Exts.A1 to A18 were marked. Respondent did not adduce any oral evidence, but Ext.B1 to B12 were marked on his side. Family Court decreed O.P.No.126 of 2012 and directed the husband to return the gold ornaments and dresses included in A schedule to the wife within two months from the date of the decree. It was also directed that if he fails to return the artic