T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, B.KEMAL PASHA
Sameera – Appellant
Versus
M. C. Mammootty – Respondent
Ramachandran Nair, J.
1. The petitioners are the legal representatives of the original tenant, against whom the first respondent filed an application for eviction under Sections 11(2)(b), 11(3), 11(4)(i), 11(4)(ii) and 11(8) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965 (for short 'the Act'). The Rent Control Court disallowed eviction and in appeal filed by the landlord, eviction is ordered under Sections 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Act. The remaining grounds have been disallowed by the Appellate Authority.
2. In the application for eviction filed by the first respondent herein, the bonafide need pleaded is for the occupation of his son, Shri Noushad who proposes to start a ready made garments shop in the said building. It was pleaded that he has acquired sufficient knowledge and experience in the said business and he is financially capable to start the business also and that the said Noushad is depending upon the landlord for the petition schedule building. It was also averred that they have no other vacant buildings to start the said business. The allegation made under Section 11(4)(ii) of the Act is that the tenant is using the building in such a manner as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.