S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala represented by The Public Prosecutor – Respondent
1. Petitioner is the accused in a crime involving abkari offence punishable under sections 55(a) of the Abkari Act. He has filed the above application seeking his release on bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for short the Code.
2. Petitioner was found transporting,and, in possession of, 825 litres of spirit in a lorry, without authority or licence, at about 3.30 p.m on 6.5.2013 by an excise party. On his arrest and production before the magistrate he was remanded to judicial custody the same day, which still continues. His application for bail had been turned down by learned Sessions Judge vide Annexure A1 order dated 26.7.2013 holding that the embargo under section 41A of the Abkari Act disentitle him to be released on bail.
3. I heard learned counsel for petitioner and also learned Public Prosecutor.
4. Apart from the contentions canvassed to challenge the implication of petitioner in the crime, learned counsel mainly stressed upon the entitlement of petitioner to have default bail under section 167(2) of the Code stating that report has not been laid completing investigation even after his detention continuing for sixty days. Petitioner had m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.