S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
Afsal Ibrahim – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, represented by The Sub Inspector of Police – Respondent
1. Petitioner is a juvenile in conflict with law who is proceeded as one among the accused in a crime involving the offence under section 364A r/w 34 IPC. Application for his release on bail moved by his father had been turned down by the juvenile Justice Board vide Annexure 4 order. Petitioner has therefore moved this application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for short the Code for his release on bail.
2. A preliminary objection was raised by the registry over the entertainability of the petition. I have ordered for numbering the petition to consider the objection raised later, and, accordingly, the petition has been numbered.
3. Objection was raised by registry on the premise that a juvenile cannot be called upon to execute a bond and hence his bail application would not lie before this court. Section 441 of the Code no doubt mandates execution of a bond by accused and his sureties for his release on bail. However it has to be noted that where the accused is a minor no bond need be executed by him and the court can accept a bond executed by his sureties. Section 448 of the Code is an exception relieving the minor from the rigour of executing a b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.