A.R.Lakshmanan, S.Sankarasubban, C.S.Rajan
Samaruddin – Appellant
Versus
Asst. Director of Enforcement – Respondent
(Per A.R. Lakshmanan, Ag. C.J.)
The unsuccessful petitioner is the appellant in this appeal. The Original Petition was filed for the following reliefs:
(a) to direct the first respondent to conduct investigation, enquiry and such other proceeding under the provisions of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and to charge and prosecute respondents 4 and 5 for violation of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act;
(b) to direct the first respondent to recover the illegally converted 95,000 Riyals which had arrived in India through unknown sources and reached the bank accounts of 5th respondent and to give the same to the petitioner and also to initiate prosecution and adjudication proceedings as provided under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act against respondents 4 and 5;
(c) to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct investigation, to complete the same and to file the charge report before the concerned Magistrate Court ort the basis of the complaint filed by the petitioner against respondents 4 and 5 and also to arrest them and also to recover the amounts including the converted properties from respondents 4 and 5 under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also to make
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.