SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 104

D.Sreedevi
Susheela – Appellant
Versus
Komalavally – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. K.V. Sohan, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. M. Sasindran, Advocate for the Respondent.

ORDER

This R.P. has been filed against the order in M.C. No. 117/95 of the Musiff (J.F.C.M.) Taliparamba.

2. Revision petitioner is the daughter of the respondent. The respondent filed M.C. 117/95 on the file of J.F.C.M. Taliparamba against the petitioner for maintenance under Section 125, Cr.P.C. The case of the petitioner in that case was that she was deserted by her husband and hence she was forced to live separately. She claimed maintenance at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month. Petitioner who was the respondent in M.C. 117/95 filed a counter stating that the petition is not maintainable as she is leading an immoral life and that she has been living separately from her husband for more than a period of 13 years without any justifiable reason. Respondent was awarded Rs. 175/- p.m. towards maintenance in another M.C. filed by her against her husband. Hence she prayed for the dismissal of the case.

3. Learned Magistrate after taking evidence awarded Rs. 200 per month towards maintenance of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the said order the respondent has filed this R.P.

4. Learned Counsel Sri. K.V. Sohan appearing for the petitioner submitted that the order of the Magistrate directing the r






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top