THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
T. Vijayakumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Petitioners were applicants before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal. They were persons trained in artificial insemination. At one stage, Government permitted them to work as private Artificial Inseminators. On a change in policy, private parties are prohibited from engaging in such activities. Such trained unemployed persons were absorbed as part time contingent employees in the Department of Animal Husbandry under the orders of the Government. The petitioners belong to that group. In due course, they were promoted as Attenders in the respective hospitals/dispensaries. In terms of the relevant Special Rules, they are entitled to be considered for appointment by transfer as Live Stock Inspectors Grade-II. The petitioners, however, wanted to be excluded from the selection process by the Public Service Commission. They went to the Tribunal saying that the competent authority may be directed to exercise the power of exemption in that regard.
3. The Tribunal, rightly, said that the power of exemption is to be sparingly used and it is a reserve power to be exercised only on valid grounds. When a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.