V.CHITAMBARESH
S. Madhan – Appellant
Versus
Sub Registrar – Respondent
1. Can the attachments effected subsequent to the creation of equitable mortgage be effaced after the property is purchased by another in sale conducted by the Recovery Officer of the Debts Recovery Tribunal?
2. The fifth respondent had mortgaged his property (3.44 ares in R.S. No. 38/2 and 0.9443 are in R.S. No. 393/3) situated in Kollam west village to the fourth respondent bank ('the bank' for short) as security for the loan availed. The bank filed O.A. No. 437/2002 in the Debts Recovery Tribunal under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 ('the Act' for short) for recovery of dues. The Debts Recovery Tribunal passed Ext.P1 final order allowing the bank to recover a sum of Rs.22,18,958.28 with interest thereon till realisation by sale of the property. A recovery certificate was accordingly issued to the Recovery Officer who proceeded to recover the debt in accordance with the provisions of the second schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961. The provisions of the second schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the Income-tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962 have been made applicable by virtue of Section 29 of the Act.
3. The Recovery Of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.