K. Abraham Mathew, J.

1. Rejection of an indigent application in a suit is no bar to file a subsequent application in respect of the same right to sue while refusal to allow the application is a bar to a second application. These different legal consequences that flow from the rejection of and the refusal to allow an indigent application make it necessary in this proceedings to dissect and examine the relevant provisions in Order 33 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The petitioner is an engineer by profession. To recover Rs.74,66,107/- from the respondents he filed a suit in the form of an indigent application in the court of the II Additional Sub Judge, Thiruvananthapuram, which was taken on its file as O.P (Ind) 38 of 1996. Notice was issued to the respondents, who entered appearance and objected to the prayer. In the enquiry the learned Sub Judge held that since the petitioner did not disclose all his assets, he could not be allowed to sue as an indigent. The court 'disallowed' the prayer and directed him to pay the court fees. In CMA 248 of 1998 filed by the petitioner this court confirmed the order of the lower court. Subsequently the petitioner paid the required co