P. Ubaid, J.

1. The landlord, who obtained an order of eviction from the trial court under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act1), lost it in appeal. Now he is before this Court with this revision brought under Section 20 of the Act, challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment of the Appellate Authority against him. He filed R.C.P No.9/2007 before the Rent Control Court (Munsiff Court, Perambra) seeking eviction on the ground of bonafide need under Section 11(3) of the Act. The petition schedule building was let out to the tenant (respondent herein) years back. In 1993, when he was aged only 23 years, he filed R.C.P No. 1/1993, for eviction on the ground of bonafide need. His request was disallowed by the trial court, and he lost his case in appeal also. The revision brought by him before this Court as C.R.P No.638/2000 was also dismissed, however giving liberty to him to file a fresh petition on the ground of bonafide need. Accordingly, he brought R.C.P No.9/2007 on the same ground of bonafide need. His case is that he does not have any job or business of his own, and he has decided to start