THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
R. Dinakaran, Thiruvananthapuram – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.
Petitioner was a Deputy Commissioner in the State Excise Department, when the infamous incident known as kalluvathukkal tragedy occurred. Going by the records and the submissions, many of the officers, who were responsible to supervise and enforce excise discipline, went scot free or with flee bite. The Government, ultimately, reduced the pension of the petitioner by `200/- per month. The Kerala Administrative Tribunal has refused to interfere with that holding that the Government was within the jurisdiction in terms of Rule 59(b) of Part-III of the Kerala Service Rules, which provides that 'if the service has not been thoroughly satisfactory, the Government may make such reduction in the amounts as they think proper'. This is, essentially, a measure qua a particular employee. Therefore, the application of Rule 59(b) and the resultant decision cannot be subjected to judicial scrutiny on the ground of hostile discrimination with reference to any other employee either in the same category or in a different category. The Tribunal having exercised its jurisdiction in terms of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and it having looked into the m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.