A.HARIPRASAD
Sidhan @ Sidharthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
1. Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr. P.C.”).
2. The appellant/accused was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for offences punishable under Sections 55(i) and 58 of the Abkari Act (in short, “the Act”). Separate sentences were imposed on the accused and it was directed that the substantive sentences should run concurrently.
3. The prosecution case: -
On 20.04.1998, the accused was found transporting 20 bottles of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (in short, “IMFL”), each bottle containing 750 ml. of liquor, in two big shopper bags. It is further alleged that he had secreted and stored 20 bottles of 375 ml. and 70 bottles of 180 ml. each of the same liquor for sale. Hence the prosecution contended that the accused had violated the above provisions of the Act.
4. After closing the investigation, a charge was filed before the learned Magistrate. Finding that the case was exclusively triable by a Court of Sessions, learned Magistrate committed the case to the Sessions Court. Thereafter, it was made over to the Additional Sessions Court. Learned Additional Sessions Judge framed charges and at the time of trial, fou
Biju v. State of Kerala (2012 (4) KLJ 256
State of U.P. v. Deoman Upadhyaya (AIR 1960 SC 1125)
Joseph v. State of Kerala (2009 (4) KHC 537).
Ramesh Chandra Mehta v. State of West Bengal (AIR 1970 SC 940)
Pulukuri Kotayya v. Emperor (AIR 1947 PC 67)
Badaku Joti Svant v. State of Mysore (AIR 1966 SC 1746)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.