HARUN-UL-RASHID, ANIL K.NARENDRAN
V. A. Salma Beevi – Appellant
Versus
Administrative Officer – Respondent
Anil K. Narendran, J.
1. The appellant is the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.29316/2013. The appellant married Shri Khader Kunjumuhammed, a pensioner of the erstwhile Dock Labour Board, on 18.9.1994. The pensioner expired on 18.9.1998 and since his first wife Smt.Haleema predeceased him on 20.9.1993, pension was discontinued with effect from 19.9.1998. In the year 2005, the appellant, who was the second wife of the pensioner, submitted application before the Cochin Port Trust (Dock Labour Division) for getting family pension.
2. By a memo dated 28.8.2006, the 1st respondent directed the appellant to produce certain documents. Alleging that, in spite of production of sufficient documents, no final orders have been communicated on the claim for family pension, the appellant had approached this Court in W.P.(C)No.30281/2009. The said Writ Petition was disposed of vide Ext.P1 judgment, directing the Cochin Port Trust to take a decision on the said application after considering the documents produced by the appellant, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Pursuant to the direction contained in Ext.P1 judgment, the 1st respondent by Ext.P2 informed the
Smt.Violet Issaac and others v. Union of India (1991 (1) SCC 725)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.