K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

1. Petitioner is a retired Secretary of the respondent Bank, against whom, arbitration proceedings were initiated, which ended in Ext.P1 award. Petitioner, in the present writ petition, is aggrieved by the order, passed on the preliminary objection raised, in the revision filed by the petitioner. Admittedly, there is no time limit prescribed under Section 84 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 for filing a revision. It is, hence, the contention of the petitioner that, Ext.P3 order passed, dismissing the revision on the question of delay, is improper.

2. This Court in Thajuddin Shameer vs. Secretary, Coastal Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. 2004 (1) K.L.T. 909 has held that, time limit for filing a revision before the Co-operative Tribunal under Section 84 is 90 days, even though there is no time limit for filing a revision petition before the Co-operative Tribunal. If such a revision is filed beyond 90 days, which is considered normally as the reasonable prescription, then the petitioner should explain the reasons for the delay. Under such circumstances, the petitioner seeks for re-consideration of the revision. The petitioner seeks an opportun