A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
F. R. Geevarghese – Appellant
Versus
District Collector Idukki – Respondent
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
1. The dispute in this writ petition pertains to refusal of permission by the District Collector for the purpose for reconstructing a Church. By Ext.P8 District Collector rejected the permission sought by the petitioner to reconstruct the Church on account of the fact that there are disputes on right and interest over the existing Church situated in re-survey 328/4, 324/4 and 324/6 of Kanjikuzhi Village. In fact, the petitioner sought review of Ext.P8 order and also permission to reconstruct the Church by Ext.P10. It appears that the dispute is between two factions of Church, namely, Orthodox faction and Party respondent-Patriarch faction.
2. Indian Constitution in principle allows religious freedom. Article 25 of the Constitution of India secures every person to practice and profess and propagate religion. Article 26 of the Constitution also prescribes right to establish institutions for religious and charitable purposes and also to manage its own affairs in the matters of religion. However, these rights are subject to public order, morality and health; which means, the State is empowered to regulate any activity relating to religion subject to pub
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.