A.HARIPRASAD
Girija – Appellant
Versus
Rajan – Respondent
1. The substantial questions of law arising in this second appeal are thus:
Is a defendant, who raised a counter claim in the suit, bound to file two appeals if the suit was decreed after rejecting the counter claim? Will that part of the judgment, disallowing the counter claim, operate as res judicata insofar as the appeal filed against the decree in the suit is concerned?
2. Factual matrix, in the shortest form, is thus: Appellants were defendants in a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction filed by the respondents alleging that they were trying to trespass into the plaint schedule property over which the respondents have exclusive title and possession. In the suit, the appellants filed a written statement raising a counter claim under Order 8 Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short, “CPC”). The appellants not only denied the allegations in the plaint that they attempted to trespass into the property, but also raised a contention that the respondents were trying to annihilate their right of way over the plaint schedule property. The trial court decreed the suit and dismissed the counter claim. The appellants took up the matter in first appeal to the lower appell
State of Punjab v. Bakshish Singh ((1998) 8 SCC 222)
Thomas and others v. D.Sudha and others (2010 (4) KHC 575)
A.Z. Mohammed Farooq v. State Government (1984 KLT 346)
T.K.V.S. Vidyapoornachary Sons v. M.R.Krishnamachary (AIR 1983 Mad. 291)
Philip v. Kinhimohammed (2006 (4) KLT 998)
C.V. Rajendran and another v. N.M. Muhammed Kunhi (AIR 2003 SC 649)
Premier Tyres Ltd. v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (1993(2) KLT 130)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.