HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V. CHITAMBARESH, J.
K.M. Sathyan – Appellant
Vs.
Returning Officer Oravil Blacksmith Carpentary Workers Industrial Co-Operative Society Limited Kozhikode & Others – Respondent
WP (C) No. 21091 of 2014 (J)
Decided On : 04-03-2015
Election - Cooperative Societies - Returning Officer's Power - State Co-operative Election Commission - The court quashed the impugned notification for election to the Managing Committee of the Society, holding that the Returning Officer lacked the power to issue such notification, which is vested solely with the State Co-operative Election Commission.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the Ext.P1 notification for election to the Managing Committee of the Society, contending that the Returning Officer did not have the power to issue such notification, which is vested solely with the State Co-operative Election Commission.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the power of superintendence, direction, and control for the conduct of all elections to Cooperative Societies is with the State Co-operative Election Commission, as per Section 28B of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 and Rule 35A(3) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, 1969. The court quashed the Ext.P1 notification and allowed the Writ Petition.
Issues: The main issue was whether the Returning Officer had the power to issue a notification for election to the Managing Committee of the Society, despite the power being vested solely with the State Co-operative Election Commission.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Returning Officer was denuded of the power to issue a notification for election, as the power was vested in the State Co-operative Election Commission as per the Act and Rules. The Ext.P1 notification was quashed, giving liberty to the State Co-operative Election Commission to issue a fresh notification based on a valid resolution.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was allowed, and no costs were imposed.
1. Ext.P1 notification for election to the Managing Committee of the second respondent Society issued by its Returning Officer is impugned by the petitioner who is a member. The challenge is rested on the only ground that the Returning Officer is denuded of such power which is vested solely with the State Cooperative Election Commission only.
2. I heard Mr.B.H.Mansoor, Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Mr.D.Somasundaram, Special Government Pleader on behalf of the State and Mr.K.Mohanakannan, Advocate on behalf of the other respondents.
3. The power of superintendence, direction and control for the conduct of all elections to Cooperative Societies is now with the State Co-operative Election Commission. This is so by virtue of Section 28B of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 ['the Act' for short] and the amendment made to Section 28B(2) thereof by Act 8 of 2013. The same applies not only to Credit, Apex, Central and Federal Societies but also to all Societies in the State irrespective of its classification under the Act. Rule 35(3) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, 1969 ['the Rules' for short] as it earlier stood empowered the Returning Officer to issue a notification for election. But Rule 35 in its entirety has been omitted by SRO.733/2014 published in the Kerala Gazette Ex.No.2867 dated 26.11.2014 with effect from 26.11.2014.
4. Rule 35A of the Rules inserted by SRO.125/2001 details the procedure regarding conduct of election to the committee of Societies by the State Cooperative Election Commission. Rule 35A (3) of the Rules is specific that the State Co-operative Election Commission shall notify the details of election to the committee of the Society. The same shall be published in two vernacular Dailies having wide circulation in the area and a copy affixed on the notice board of the head office and the branches if any of the Society. The notification shall contain the following particulars:-
(i) The number of vacancies to be filled up by election;
(ii) Any area or constituency that is specified in the bye-laws from which members are to be elected;
iii) The date on which and the place at which the preliminary notification of the list of members qualified to vote as the voter shall be published.
iv) The dates between which objections shall be filed and the date on which, the hours between which, and the place at which, the objections, if any, shall be scrutinized;
v) the date on which, and the place at which, the final voters list shall be published.
vi) The date on which, the place at which, and hours between which nomination paper shall be filed by the contesting candidate or by his proposer or seconder;
vii) The date and hour when the nomination paper will be scrutinized;
viii) The date on which, the place at which and the hours between which, polling if necessary will take place.
5. The Returning Officer is thus denuded of the power to issue a notification for election and Ext.P1 notification issued by the first respondent Returning Officer is non est in law. The power vested in the State Co-operative Election Commission as per Section 28B of the Act and Rule 35A(3) of the Rules has been usurped by the first respondent. Ext.P1 notification is hence quashed giving liberty to the State Co-operative Election Commission to issue a fresh notification based on a valid resolution.
The Writ Petition is allowed.
No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.