DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
P. P. Poulose – Appellant
Versus
Kappur Grama Panchayath – Respondent
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
1. Briefly stated, the petitioner, a licensee having the privilege to vend toddy, is aggrieved by Exhibit P3 stop memo issued by the first respondent Grama Panchayat. In fact, the respondent Grama Panchayat has issued the said stop memo directing the petitioner not to carry on with his trade in toddy on twin grounds: that the shop has been causing obstruction to the public; that petitioner has been running the shop within the territorial limits of the Grama Panchayat without licence. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has got Exhibits P1 and P1(a) Abkari licences to carry on the trade. He has further contended that the petitioner is not required to take any licence from the Grama Panchayat. In support of his contentions, the learned counsel has drawn my attention to the statement filed by the second respondent, the Government.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent Grama Panchayat has, however, made strenuous efforts to counter the contentions of the petitioner. He has submitted that it is obligatory on the part of the petitioner to obtain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.