SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 169

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
Krishnankutty – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Dinny Thomas, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Bindu Gopinath, Public Prosecutor.

Judgment

K. Abraham Mathew, J.

1. In Sessions Case No.52 of 2013 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Kalpetta the appellant was tried for the offences under Sections 307 and 450 IPC. The allegation against him was that in the small hours of 26.8.2012 he trespassed into the room in a shed in which his co-worker Sreedharan was residing and attempted to murder him by striking with a chopper. Learned Sessions Judge found the evidence adduced by the prosecution sufficient to prove the case against the appellant and convicted him of the both offences. For the offence under Section 307 IPC the Sessions Judge sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of the fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three more months, and for the offence under Section 450 IPC to undergo rigorous for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of the fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of 3 months. There is a direction to pay the fine amount, if realised, to the victim.

2. In the charge framed by the learned Sessions Judge the victim has been referred to as CW2. The learned Sessions Judge did























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top