Mary Joseph, J.

1. R.C.R.No.297 of 2014 is filed by the respondent in R.C.A.No.15 of 2014, of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam and the petitioner-landlord in R.C.P.No.82/2012 of the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam. The respondent in the Revision Petition is the appellant in the said R.C.A. and respondent-tenant in the Rent Control Petition.

2.R.C.R.No.316 of 2014 is filed by the appellant in R.C.A.No.15 of 2014 of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam and the respondent-tenant in R.C.P.No.82 of 2012 of the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam. The respondent in the R.C.R is the respondent in the said R.C.A. and the petitioner/landlord in the Rent Control Petition.

3.Both the Revision Petitions cited supra are filed challenging the fixation of divergent rates of rent by the authorities below for the petition schedule room under Section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, which for the sake of convenience would hereinafter be referred to as "the Act". The parties to these revision petitions shall also, for the sake of convenience, be referred to hereinafter in accordance with their original status in the R.C.P as landlord and tenant.

4.