SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 806

SUNIL THOMAS
SUKUMARAN – Appellant
Versus
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BALUSSERY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
FOR THE APPELLANT : SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN
FOR THE RESPONDENT: SMT.LALIZA (PP)

JUDGMENT

The sole accused in Sessions Case No.227/2001 of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track,(Adhoc II), Kozhikode for the offence punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act challenges the conviction and sentence.

2. The prosecution allegation was that on 17/2/2000, at about 6.30. a.m., while the C.I.of Balussery police station, along with the patrolling party, was on their regular patrolling duty, they reached the place of incident and intercepted the accused who was carrying a 10 liter plastic can. The accused was intercepted, searched and it was found that the can contained illicit arrack. After the initial formalities, he was arrested at the spot and later produced before the learned Magistrate. After completion of the investigation, the final report was laid and the accused faced trial before the Sessions Court.

3. To substantiate the prosecution allegation, PWs1 to 4 were examined and Exhibits P1 to P8 were marked. The accused pleaded not guilty and tendered the defence witness, examined as DW1. The court below, on an evaluation of the available materials, concluded that the accused was guilty under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act, convicted and sente














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top