ASHOK BHUSHAN, A.M.SHAFFIQUE
SATISH CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
T. C. MATHEW – Respondent
Shaffique, J.
This contempt case has been referred by the learned Single Judge as per order dated 12/07/2013, after having found that there is prima facie contempt on the side of the respondents.
2. The contempt case has been filed alleging non-compliance of an undertaking given by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents that the Executive Committee of the Kozhikode District Cricket Association (hereinafter referred as 'District Association') shall not be superseded and any such decision would be taken by the Central Council of the Kerala Cricket Association (for short 'KCA') only after considering the enquiry report and in the event of any action being taken, the same shall be done only after issuance of a show cause notice and after considering the explanation offered by the District Association.
3. Petitioner alleges that in violation of the aforesaid undertaking, which is recorded by the learned Single Judge in the judgment dated 09/06/2011, the respondents had taken a decision to supersede the newly elected District Association and an ad hoc committee has been formed without notice or giving an opportunity to explain their stand in the matter.
4. An affi
Indian Airports Employees Union v. Ranjan Chatterjee and another [(1999) 2 SCC 537]
Anil K. Surana and another v. State Bank of Hyderabad [(2007) 10 SCC 257]
Sahdeo v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others [(2010) 3 SCC 705]
Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. United India Insurance Co Ltd and others [(2010) 12 SCC 770]
O.P. Sreedhara Menon and others v. K Amarnath Shetty and others [2012 (2) KLJ 23]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.