SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 933

ASHOK BHUSHAN, A.M.SHAFFIQUE
SATISH CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
T. C. MATHEW – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
SRI. RAJIT
SRI. NIDHI SAM JOHNS, SRI. P.B. KRISHNAN, SRI. A.V. THOMAS

Judgment

Shaffique, J.

This contempt case has been referred by the learned Single Judge as per order dated 12/07/2013, after having found that there is prima facie contempt on the side of the respondents.

2. The contempt case has been filed alleging non-compliance of an undertaking given by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents that the Executive Committee of the Kozhikode District Cricket Association (hereinafter referred as 'District Association') shall not be superseded and any such decision would be taken by the Central Council of the Kerala Cricket Association (for short 'KCA') only after considering the enquiry report and in the event of any action being taken, the same shall be done only after issuance of a show cause notice and after considering the explanation offered by the District Association.

3. Petitioner alleges that in violation of the aforesaid undertaking, which is recorded by the learned Single Judge in the judgment dated 09/06/2011, the respondents had taken a decision to supersede the newly elected District Association and an ad hoc committee has been formed without notice or giving an opportunity to explain their stand in the matter.

4. An affi

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top