SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 951

P.B.SURESH KUMAR
PREMALATHA – Appellant
Versus
KAMALAKSHY – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
SRI. P. GOPAKUMARAN NAIR, SRI. C.S. DIAS
SRI. C.A. CHACKO, BINDU B.N.

Judgment

The additional third defendant in O.S.No.522 of 1997 on the file of the Sub Court, Thrissur is the appellant.

2. Respondents 1 and 2 filed the suit referred to above for setting aside Ext.A2 sale deed in respect of 25 cents of the property out of the plaint schedule property and for recovery of possession of the said property with mesne profits from the defendant. The plaintiffs are the younger sisters of the defendant. The plaint schedule property was bequeathed to them and to their stepmother Parukutty by their father late Iyyer as per Ext.A2 will with a stipulation that if any one of them dies, the remaining will take the property absolutely. The case of the plaintiffs is that the step-mother of the plaintiffs Parukutty died during 1980 and that on the death of Parukutty, the defendant approached the plaintiffs and represented that the relatives of their stepmother would attempt to get the properties of their father and to prevent the same, a document needs to be executed by them. According to the plaintiffs, on the basis of the said representation, the plaintiffs have put their signatures on 23.1.981 in Ext.A1 document prepared by the defendant under the impression that















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top