SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 532

T.B.RADHAKRISHNAN, SUNIL THOMAS
G. VENUGOPAL – Appellant
Versus
JOYAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
SRI. RAJEEV V. KURUP
SRI. ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR)

Judgment

Sunil Thomas J.

This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.54 of 2004 of the Sub Court, Kottayam in a suit for recovery of money. Defeated defendants are the appellants.

2. The case set up by the plaintiff before the court below was based on an agreement for sale. According to the plaintiff, the plaint schedule property belonged to the first defendant and on receipt of a consideration of Rs.7,50,000/- by the first defendant, both the defendants executed an agreement for sale on 29.10.1997 in favour of the plaintiff for a total consideration of Rs.8,00,000/-. The original settlement deed executed by the second defendant in favour of the first defendant was handed over. The plaintiff was ready and willing to perform his part of the contract. However, in February 1998, the defendants requested to withdraw from the agreement which was accepted by the plaintiff. On 28.02.1998, first defendant delivered a cheque for a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- and promised to repay the balance sale consideration of Rs.3,50,000/- with interest before 15.04.1998. This was endorsed on the agreement for sale. The cheque was collected. However, the defendants failed to pay the money as





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top