A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
BINCY RAJ D. R. – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – Respondent
Petitioners 1 to 4 in the writ petition are working as teachers, and petitioners 5 and 6 as staff, of the 3rd respondent School. The said School is affiliated to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), New Delhi. In the writ petition, the petitioners are aggrieved by Ext.P6 series of suspension orders that have been issued to them. It is the case of the petitioners that, while they have been working in the School for a number of years, without any break in service, they were not being paid basic salary by the 3rd respondent School in accordance with the affiliation bye-laws of the CBSE. Further, while the 3rd respondent was deducting various amounts, from the remuneration payable to them, towards Provident Fund, the said amounts were not paid by the 3rd respondent to the statutory authorities under the Employees Provident Fund Act. The petitioners, therefore, took up the matter with the statutory authority as also with the 1st respondent Board. It is the specific case of the petitioners in the writ petition that, it was as a retaliatory measure for making complaints against the management of the 3rd respondent that the latter initially prevented the petitioners f
Anadi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas Swami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust v. V.R. Rudani
G. Bassi Reddy v. International Crops Research (2003) 4 SCC 225
Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology
K. Krishnamacharyulu v. Sri. Venkateswara Hindu College of Engg.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.