T.B.RADHAKRISHNAN, SUNIL THOMAS
C. G. RAVEENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
C. G. GOPI – Respondent
Sunil Thomas, J.
The plaintiffs in O.S.No.17/2010 of the Sub Court, Ernakulam, aggrieved by the dismissal of the suit for partition, has preferred this appeal.
2. The plaintiffs and defendants are the children of late Govindan and Bhanumathi. Govindan died on 28/8/1994 and Bhanumathi on 18/5/2004. The plaint schedule properties belonged to Govindan. He had constructed a building therein and was residing there with his family till his death. The plaintiffs got married to persons of their choice and hence, they have been keeping away from the company of the remaining family members. The first defendant is a married person with a child and second defendant is a divorcee and third one a spinster. They are residing in the plaint schedule property. According to plaintiffs, after the death of Govindan, the right on the properties have devolved on the plaintiffs and the defendants equally and they are entitled to inherit. However, the plaintiffs came to know about a registered Will bearing No.15/85 of SRO, Tripunithura, allegedly executed by Govindan, on receipt of a copy of petition in O.P.No.4/2009 of the Principal Munsiff Court, Ernakulam. The plaintiffs are not aware of any suc
Rani Purnima Devi v. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Deb & another AIR 1962 SC 567
M. Venkatasubbaiah v. Subbamma & others AIR 1956 AP 195
Ramachandra v. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1957 SC 381
Mobarik Ali Ahmed v. State of Bombay AIR 1957 SC 857
Fakruddin v. The State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1967 SC 1326
State (Delhi Administration) v. Pali Ram AIR 1979 SC 14
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.